Even if only passing by or looking through the window, Blur—Borroso, Unshärfe by Camila Ospina Gaitán and Juan Ricaurte Riveros at Orbit in Hamburg, is hardly discrete. Screenshots of an Instagram warning, printed on fabric and hung from the ceiling, announce hostile dialogue. Just behind, bulky pieces covered in golden foil float on the floor and blur with an immanence of aggression. Plunged in a white frame, swinging in metallic reflections, its tips light and tense, ‘Garment No. 1’ and ‘Garment No. 2’, both by Juan, appear suspended. Underneath, might there be a body sustaining the shape of this sheet?
In contrast, as you make your way through the space, small, delicate pieces of nipple-shaped blown glass rise subtly into focus. These are held by thin pieces of metal. Glass Nipples, a series of sculptures by Camila, may at first be unnoticeable among the massive golden bodies and fabric. But the physicality, and reflections, of these modest glass objects pierce the room uncomprimisingly. It is clear that the initial impact of the flamboyant scenario is a game of illusion—as these lascivious surfaces draw our attention, over-riding more subtle works, we’re quickly entangled in a question of objectification.
Knowing previous work by these artists, this is hardly surprising. Camila’s series focusses on the sexualization and objectification of the female body, questioning its ongoing colonial perception. Her response is to invest the body with a direct communication as a site of politics, history and resistance. Juan’s work stems from a year-long obsession with a popular colonial syncretism in South America, particularly in Colombia, where the Virgin Mary is often associated with the Cordilleras, an extensive network of mountain ranges that is also an important symbol of worship for indigenous native groups.
This tension, and its contrary playfulness, illustrates colonial strategy in Latin America, which allowed evangelical missionaries during the 1500’s to frame a more relatable approach to christianity. What both Camila and Juan attempt to show—in a quite different manner—is that the importance of this approach lies beyond symbolism—these strategies served above all as economic proxies.